Tech-media-tainment
Entertainment, pop culture, personal technology and media
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Shark-attack movies are getting more ridiculous
It wouldn’t be summer cinema without shark-attack movies. But some of the new movies are playing more for laughs than scares.
“Water Park Shark” is a B-movie horror comedy from Anthony C. Ferrante – the director behind the famously ridiculous “Sharknado” franchise. The plot involves great white sharks breaching a water park in Cape Cod, Mass. It’s due out on July 3 on Amazon Prime Video.
“Sorority Shark Attack” reportedly is set for a streaming video release later this year. It features Robert Carradine (“Revenge of the Nerds”) in one of his final film roles before his death in February.
“Thrash,” which premiered April 10 on Netflix, also generated as many laughs as scares. The plot has a pack of hungry bull sharks invading a flooded coastal town in South Carolina during a hurricane. To make matters worse, the initial storm surge breaks open a massive commercial tanker truck carrying animal blood.
Here’s the plot of “Chum,” released on June 5: “A newlywed couple joins friends on a Mediterranean yacht excursion, only to find themselves caught between a predatory shark and a psychopathic killer in their midst – transforming a sun-drenched escape into a fight for survival.”
“Chum,” starring Alice Eve, received terrible reviews.
Another recent shark-attack movie was “Deep Water,” starring Aaron Eckhart. It involves an international flight that crashes in the Pacific Ocean, and the passengers and crew must work to survive a group of circling sharks. Released on May 1, the film received mildly positive reviews from critics.
Coming soon are “The Devil’s Mouth” and “The Bay,” both of which feature sharks attacking tourists in Thailand.
“The Devil’s Mouth” stars Kathryn Newton and Lana Condor and is set for release on Amazon Prime Video on July 29.
“The Bay” stars Francesca Eastwood and is due for release on July 17 in select theaters and on digital video on demand.
Next year will seen the release on Netflix of “Under Paris 2,” the sequel to “Under Paris” (2024), which featured a giant shark in the Seine. Yeah, totally believable.
Monday, June 29, 2026
AI-generated fake movie stills infuriate
Just as frustrating as the proliferation online of AI-generated fake movie posters are social media posts with photos purporting to be from new movies. They usually come with teases to the effect of “You’ve got to see this movie. It’s incredible.”
But they offer no details. No title. No release information. Nothing. It’s all one big infuriating tease.
Some photos are obviously fake. One still showed a female sniper with two right hands. (See above.) Generative AI now tends to make dumb mistakes like that. But the technology is improving, and it will get harder to tell the truth from the lies.
What follows are some recent phony movie stills posted on X. Be sure to mute those X users who do this so they don’t show up in your feed again.
A true masterpiece from start to finish. 10/10. 🔥🍿 pic.twitter.com/rVtPI6ioka
— Mudryk Jr (@mudryk_jr) June 14, 2026
This movie is a masterpiece pic.twitter.com/k9otyumWRA
— Mudryk Jr (@mudryk_jr) June 20, 2026
This movie is a masterpiece pic.twitter.com/IXMpe11Ung
— People Of The Internet (@PeopleOfTheInt) June 20, 2026
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Fake movies competing with real movies for attention online
I used to rely on suggestions from social media for new movies to watch, but lately X, formerly known as Twitter, has been awash in posts promoting fake movies using AI-created posters and photos.
At first glance, some look compelling. But you soon realize that you’ve been duped. Others with A-list actors are obvious fakes.
The situation is as bad as the numerous online photos of sexy women at FIFA games that turned out to be AI frauds.
Some of these phony movies are fan fiction or wishful thinking as far as casting. But the people who post them don’t usually say that and present them as if they are real. They likely post them to generate user engagement through clickbait.
The worst offender is an account called Movies House (@luther_181). I have muted them and suggest you do too. In fact, I mute all accounts that post this garbage.
Photo: Fake movie poster for “Vis A Vis” with images of actors Jason Statham, Dwyane Johnson and Angelina Jolie.
Greatest movie to watch,
— Fumbo Khan (@fumbokhanJr) June 27, 2026
0 Sex scene
0 Drugs
1000/100 Action🔥🎬 pic.twitter.com/9TlYldp3OY
Secrets run deeply 🎬🍿 pic.twitter.com/1dGSWGMDAh
— MOVIES HOUSE 🍿 (@luther_181) June 26, 2026
Not hype. Just greatness pic.twitter.com/n6cN6ZvIgY
— MOVIES HOUSE 🍿 (@luther_181) June 24, 2026
Change my mind… this is 10/10 💯🍿 pic.twitter.com/lBNh7Q6XJW
— Mudryk Jr (@mudryk_jr) June 22, 2026
10/10 movie worth 2 hours of your time pic.twitter.com/vez0hUThVi
— Malkia Nyuki 👑 (@nyuki_malkia) June 27, 2026
CONVOY (2026)🎬🍿 pic.twitter.com/JURrJdcmv6
— MOVIES HOUSE 🍿 (@luther_181) June 22, 2026
BLACK WATER. or. EQUALIZER 4 ? pic.twitter.com/2oHj7A9GnL
— MOVIES HOUSE 🍿 (@luther_181) June 19, 2026
Evening Movie 10/10🔥🍿
— Mudryk Jr (@mudryk_jr) June 19, 2026
The most mind-blowing movie breaking the world in 2025 right now🔥🍿 pic.twitter.com/VguPeCQ6KB
أكثر فلم مكسر الدنيا في نتفلكس حالياً🔥🔥 pic.twitter.com/ywaJV0NkPb
— خربشات (@5_ici) June 21, 2026
This movie hits differently pic.twitter.com/F4svmbKwjg
— Mudryk Jr (@mudryk_jr) June 21, 2026
فيلم عالمي 10/10🔥🍿 pic.twitter.com/zuqvJwuk3z
— ليون (@Bas_a7) June 20, 2026
Friday, June 19, 2026
AI-created fake photos of FIFA World Cup fans show a growing problem
Lately I’ve seen a flood of photos on social media platform X that purport to show beautiful female fans of national teams participating in the FIFA World Cup. But many of them are fakes created by generative artificial intelligence applications. And it’s getting hard to tell the real ones from the fakes.
Thankfully some X users do the research and flag the fantasy photos with Community Notes. They point out flaws in the photos such as digital artifacts that are telltale signs of AI. But these fakes will only get better, making it harder to discern the truth from falsehoods.
I appreciate it when some posters add labels to mark their photos or videos as AI-created. But not all netizens are good actors.
And this is just sports and entertainment, fake photos will be a bigger problem in news and politics. One recent post contained an AI-altered photo that showed an event at the White House that didn’t occur. Expect more of this as AI develops.
Photo at top: AI-generated photo of a sexy FIFA fan posted multiple times on X.
Related articles:
World Cup ‘supporter’ goes viral as AI image leaves fans duped (News.com.au; June 14, 2026)
Is she real? USA World Cup fan in tiny bikini goes massively viral (Mundo Deportivo; June 13, 2026)
I Say Again🙂↕️
— 𝙈𝙊𝙑𝙄𝙀 𝙏𝙄𝙈𝙀 🍿 (@moviiettime) June 16, 2026
FIFA Never Fails to Entertain us ❤️ pic.twitter.com/OzOCPt5S4d
Thank you FIFA WORLD CUP. pic.twitter.com/7Zm2BSUkHR
— The Great Star ⭐ (@omnet_Blueco) June 18, 2026
Thiên thần có thật không
— quynhhuongstudio_aiart (@lanla3461765435) June 15, 2026
Mình nghĩ là có
Hãy xem cô gái cổ động viên bóng đá của Croatia , cô ấy đang chăm chú nhìn các cầu thủ thi đấu ❤️🥰#croatia #football #girl #angel pic.twitter.com/xpFVEkvY9F
🇩🇪 Germany fans already celebrating like they won the World Cup 😂
— Anbol (@iblion12) June 15, 2026
Cameraman knew exactly where to point the camera pic.twitter.com/6xSdeBPVsm
Videos of beautiful girls at world cup 😘❤️
— Claire❣️ (@Mesi_claire) June 14, 2026
Watch threads🧵🧵🧵 pic.twitter.com/b5D0jXb7IQ
Hilo con las mujeres mas TOP en lo que llevamos del mundial 👇🏻🧶
— Kai✨ (@VolviendoVIRAL) June 14, 2026
1. México pic.twitter.com/m51rmyKehS
The Netherlands and Japan played out a thrilling 2-2 draw on the pitch 🇳🇱🇯🇵
— sexy word cup (@iasexyy) June 14, 2026
But in the stands, it was a complete Dutch rout. 🔥🇳🇱#fifaworldcup pic.twitter.com/g1P7hxrDov
How beautiful are the German women!🥵🇩🇪🔥 pic.twitter.com/dwZJzyIaUy
— World Cup 2026 (@ofootball__) June 14, 2026
📸 Cameraman Spots the Stadium’s Most Stunning Fan 😍
— The Football Dude (@footballxdude) June 18, 2026
Her smile had everyone talking ❤️✨
A true FIFA World Cup 2026 viral sensation 🤩🔥 pic.twitter.com/k9D0lkcG3r
Tag a Austria supporter 📣 Reply with a shot of your jersey — let's see the collection 📸#WorldCup2026 #FIFAWorldCup #Austria #DasTeam #AUT 🇦🇹 #MadeWithAI #AIart pic.twitter.com/IIZH8OohH0
— AI Muse (@Kunda623270) June 18, 2026
Sunday, June 14, 2026
Kylie Minogue should be in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
The Netflix documentary series “Kylie” provides compelling evidence that Australian pop music superstar Kylie Minogue needs to be in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
The fact that she has never been nominated is a disgrace. The longevity of her career, her reinventions, her chart-topping hits and sold-out concerts to this day are all factors in her favor. The three-part Netflix series also shows the personal and professional challenges she has faced and overcome.
Australia has been a noticeable blind spot for the Rock Hall. The only Aussie acts in the hall are AC/DC and the Bee Gees.
Aussie snubs include Minogue, INXS (nominated for the first time this year), Midnight Oil, Crowded House and Nick Cave.
Next year would be a perfect time to induct Minogue as she reportedly will be on another world tour.
Kylie is an icon who deserves to be in the Rock Hall before a raft of other female solo artists.
The 2026 Netflix docuseries “Kylie” and concert film from her Tension tour “Kylie: Tension Tour Live” hopefully will give Minogue an exposure lift to hall voters.
Put her name on the nomination ballot and she will lead the fan poll. I’m sure of it.
Related articles:
Kylie Minogue and the Art of Staying a Mega-Famous Pop Star Forever (Rolling Stone; June 5, 2026)
Kylie Minogue Confirms 40th Anniversary Tour Plans: ‘I’m Probably Not Meant to Say This, But Yes’ (Billboard; May 17, 2026)
Photos: “Kylie” docuseries poster and photos from the premiere. (Netflix)
Sunday, June 7, 2026
AI summaries are taking oxygen from news publishers
Artificial intelligence summaries from the likes of Google Gemini are very enticing. Who needs to scour an article for a fact or information when Google can just pull it out and present it to you?
But fewer visits to news publishers’ websites mean less advertising revenue for those companies. That threatens their business and the journalism they create.
"The open web is on its way out. With AI, Google is reducing everyone to raw data providers,” Richard Kramer, a financial analyst with Arete Research, said in a New York Times article.
Google announced its latest search changes on May 19 at its Google I/O conference. It called the changes its “biggest upgrade in over 25 years.”
“Google’s AI search tools may genuinely improve usability, but they also fundamentally reshape the web ecosystem Google originally helped build,” Techradar contributing writer Eric Hal Schwartz said in a news post. “Publishers, creators, and websites increasingly worry that conversational AI answers reduce incentives for users to click through to original sources.”
TechCrunch writer Sarah Perez summed it up by writing, “The era of the ‘ten blue links’ is officially over.”
She added, “The links, to clarify, have not entirely disappeared; they are just no longer the priority for many types of searches.”
The big news publishers have been able to extract licensing fees from Google and other AI firms for scraping their content, but the little guys are largely on the outs.
Related articles:
Journalism job cuts in 2026 tracked (Press Gazette)
New York Times chief: How and why publishers should fight AI ‘tsunami’ (Press Gazette; June 2, 2026)
New York Times Publisher Warns That AI Companies Are Making Choices That ‘Violate Settled Law’ and Could Cause a ‘Great Deal of Unnecessary Harm’ (Variety; June 1, 2026)
News Corp CEO Robert Thomson warns AI companies scraping without paying: ‘We’re coming for you’ (Press Gazette; March 4, 2026)
News Corp, Meta in AI Content Licensing Deal Worth Up to $50 Million a Year (Wall Street Journal; March 3, 2026)
Sunday, May 31, 2026
Google search changes are hurting small news publishers
For many years, news publishers relied on “search engine optimization” techniques to get their articles to rank highly on Google search to drive traffic to their websites. But recent changes at Google have slashed traffic to news publishers. And it’s only going to get worse with AI.
With Google Gemini artificial intelligence, the company’s search engine has become an answer engine. It doesn’t lead with links to websites or news articles where individuals can find relevant information. It cuts to the chase and provides answers to questions that web surfers are asking. Except AI has been known to confidently give incorrect information.
With AI-generated summaries, web users don’t need to click through to suggested webpages to find information. Google just presents it to them on the Google search page. While it provides links as footnotes, most users aren’t going to check out the source material.
News publishers big and small are seeing their web traffic (and related advertising revenue) from search dry up. The biggest publishers are better positioned to find ways to weather the changes, but the little guys are getting squashed.
Google is no longer primarily about referring traffic to publishers – it has become the destination for information, leeching off the work of others. Google’s AI-generated summaries have replaced the “10 blue links” it used to provide.
Google launched its AI Overviews in May 2024 and has since upgraded its search page to an “AI Mode” with chatbot-style answers provided by Google Gemini. And the negative impact to news publishers and other websites has been dramatic.
One website that I’ve used for following news on streaming video services, The TV Answerman, recently announced that it is ending its daily/regular coverage of the TV industry because of the loss of revenue from the Google changes.
“There’s no way to continue due to Google Search’s decision in 2023 to promote large sites (and marketing partners) over small ones such as this,” TV Answerman publisher Phillip Swann said in an April 17 post. “Google has 90 percent of the Search market; if it decides to bury your stories, you’re pretty much history.”
Swann provided more commentary in an April 28 post.
“Like many other small publishers, I have seen my site traffic plummet over the last few years due to Google Search’s algorithm change that elevated larger sites and marketing partners such as Reddit,” he said.
And his problems occurred before Google announced on May 19 its latest big search changes that would focus on AI answers.
Some publishers are preparing for “Google zero,” the point at which they receive zero click-throughs from the search platform.
Related articles:
Top 50 US news websites: Half of sites see traffic fall 20% or more in a year. (Press Gazette; May 8, 2026)
Exclusive: Small publishers hit hardest by search traffic declines (Axios; March 17, 2026)
AI surfacing is messy: Data shows publisher visibility and traffic often misalign (Digiday; March 11, 2026)
The Internet's Most-Read Tech Publications Have Lost 58% of Their Google Traffic Since 2024 (Growtika; Feb. 26, 2026)












