Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Patriots raise warning flags on Islamic jihad 2.0 in the U.S.


The Islamic takeover of the U.S. is underway, albeit on a local and regional basis for now (see Minnesota and Texas, for instance), according to numerous analysts and activists.
The alarm sirens are blaring, and the warning flags are out, but mainstream media just dismiss those concerns as Islamophobia, which isn’t really a thing. That’s because a phobia is an “irrational” fear of something. But Islam has shown itself to be a violent and repressive system of governance wherever it gets established. It’s a more brutal form of authoritarian control than socialism.
But the leftists who promote open borders and no vetting of immigrants to the U.S. are only focused on winning elections for Democrats. That has created a strange alliance of conflicting philosophies (gays for Gaza, for instance), united only by the desire to oust conservative politicians, Republicans and especially President Donald Trump.
The media blames the ongoing violence and destruction in France on young people supposedly protesting education and economic conditions. But the story they don’t want to tell is the impact that unchecked immigration from Islamic countries is having on France, the U.K. and other countries in Europe.
Islamic immigrants are loyal to their religion (some call it a “death cult”) not the countries they move to. This leads to lack of assimilation and the creation of separate societies with their own rules and laws that are an affront to Western values. Once in the majority, Muslim rules apply to all.
Islamic leaders have shifted their approach from traditional terrorism to taking over Western institutions from within. Call its jihad 2.0. Muslims are well organized and they’re getting elected to school boards, judgeships, local, state and federal representative positions to advance their causes. They bring with them the principles of their religion and U.S. rules of law are secondary.
Conservative voices complaining about unchecked immigration and the rise of Islamic influence have been censored and even jailed in some Western countries. Thankfully that hasn’t happened in the U.S. yet. However, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only applies to government censorship. That doesn’t prevent internet companies from deplatforming critics with views they disagree with.
Luckily for First Amendment supporters such as myself, entrepreneur Elon Musk bought social media platform X, formerly Twitter. He has allowed critics of the Islamic religion and governance as well as supporters of strong U.S. border controls and rational immigration policies to have a voice online.
What follows are a list of X content creators you should follow to get the real skinny on what’s going on the U.S. when it comes to Islam and immigration.
Please read these X accounts: Gad Saad (@GadSaad), Ex-Muslim Testimonies (@FamilieB3), Amy Mek (@AmyMek), RAIR Foundation USA (@RAIRFoundation), Dr. Maalouf (@realMaalouf), Chloe (@ItsAllPoliticss), End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) and Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes).
And for good measure, here are a few celebrities who “get it” on the subject: James Woods (@RealJamesWoods), Rob Schneider (@RobSchneider) and Kevin Sorbo (@ksorbs).
Finally, I’d like to mention anti-Islam demonstrator Salwan Momika, who was killed for his views. He was assassinated in January 2025 at the age of 38. His account (@Salwan_Momika1) is archived on X. His words live on.
Get educated on the threat Islam poses to the U.S. before it’s too late.

Photos: Funny memes that speak the truth about Islam.







Sunday, October 18, 2026

Crime data is being manipulated. Mainstream media is silent.


The news media are reluctant to discuss race, ethnicity or immigration status when it comes to crimes, except in instances where the offender is Caucasian and victim is non-white. The supposed reason for this is because reporters don’t want to reinforce negative stereotypes. But what if the data backs up stereotypes such as blacks being more likely than whites to commit violent crimes?
Those media outlets and reporters are doing a disservice to the public and their profession by refusing to disclose all the facts about a case. That includes race and immigration status. Likely many journalists are blinded by their liberal, progressive politics and don’t want to give weight to conservative claims, especially when it comes to illegal aliens, because that would support the views of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Thankfully there are independent journalists such as American hero Nick Shirley, who has exposed widespread government fraud, most notably by Somali immigrants in Minnesota. Opponents of his reporting are trying to claim that he is right wing or far right when he is simply showing how U.S. tax dollars are being wasted and stolen. That should be a non-political issue.
Mainstream media are too reliant on access journalism and taking the word of government agencies and politicians (from whatever slant they favor) instead of doing boots on the ground reporting like Shirley to see what’s really going on.
Another group of citizen journalists is reporting on how crime data is being manipulated by municipalities labeling criminal suspects as white when they are black, Hispanic or Middle Eastern. Sometimes the racial data is changed on a secondary arrest.
This skews crime reporting data to show more whites are committing crimes than truly are. That is fraud. And worse yet, government agencies and the news media will use this erroneous data in their reporting, spreading that misinformation and giving it validation.
Thankfully there are users of social media platform X, formerly Twitter, who are exposing the fraud in states like Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, Texas and Wisconsin.
X users who actively point out the erroneous racial data in offender booking reports include Triple D (@thetripledshow), White (@thatsnotawhite), Matt Van Swol (@mattvanswol) and White Criminal of the Day (@WhiteCrimeOTD).

Photos: Sample images from The Triple D Show, That’s Not A White and White Criminal Of The Day.


Friday, October 9, 2026

Hollywood movies about the tech industry are having a moment


Hollywood has taken a renewed interest in the technology industry as a source of subject material for movies and TV series.
This weekend (Oct. 9) will see the release of “The Social Reckoning,” starring Jeremy Strong as Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Meta Platforms, owner of Facebook and Instagram. The movie depicts the company’s legal troubles and the societal harm caused Meta’s social networks.
The movie is a spiritual sequel to “The Social Network” (2010), which starred Jesse Eisenberg as Zuckerberg. Both movies were written by Aaron Sorkin.
On Nov. 18, Netflix will release an eight-episode series called “The Altruists” about the rise and fall of Sam Bankman-Fried and the collapse of his FTX cryptocurrency exchange. Anthony Boyle plays Bankman-Fried.
Coming to theaters in December is “Artificial,” starring Andrew Garfield as OpenAI CEO Sam Altman during a pivotal era at the artificial intelligence company, which included the launch of ChatGPT.
But wait there’s more. In addition to that trio of biographical tech industry movies, there are also several notable documentaries coming.
Elon Musk, the chief executive of Tesla, SpaceX and xAI, is profiled in the documentary “Musk” from director Alex Gibney. The film, which runs 3 hours and 52 minutes, is due out Oct. 16.
Elizabeth Holmes, the notorious founder of Theranos, is the subject of “You Can See Everything.” The film, which clocks in at 2 hours and 54 minutes, also is set for release on Oct. 16.

I have compiled two lists on IMDb about these types of movies. (See links below.)

IT industry movies based on true stories


Documentaries about the IT industry

Related articles:

At the movies, tech founders like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk are in their villain era (Business Insider; Oct. 9, 2026)

Hollywood’s New Shows Take Aim at Big Tech (The Wall Street Journal; Sept. 3, 2026)


Sunday, October 4, 2026

Sexy ‘Odyssey’ costumes set to conquer Halloween 2026


“The Odyssey,” the epic film directed by Christopher Nolan, dominated at movie theaters this year and its influence is likely to spread into adult Halloween costumes this year.
You can expect to see lots of sexy women dressed as Greek goddesses and Helen of Troy along with men in ancient Greek warrior outfits at parties and nightclubs on Oct. 31.
In its annual Halloween costume trend report, retailer Spirit Halloween said this about the trend: “Mythological lore is staging a ferocious takeover. Ripped straight from ancient texts and cinematic masterpieces, battle-hardened Greek armor, flowing cloaks, and epic accessories are primed to rule 2026.”
Lingerie company Yandy also is spotlighting sexy Odyssey-inspired costumes this year.


Saturday, October 3, 2026

Spirit Halloween costume memes parody politicians, celebrities, white-collar office drones


Every Halloween season, social media is flooded with fake Spirit Halloween costume memes. And this year is no exception.
The viral images use a specific template: the iconic orange-and-yellow Spirit packaging, a generic name for a politician, celebrity or derided worker type, and a bulleted list of humorous accessories included in the bag.
A lot of the memes circulated are favorites from prior years that are still relevant.
What follows is a collection of funny Spirit Halloween meme images. New this year are Madonna at the MTV VMA 2026 ceremony (see image above), Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, fake football player Daejon Love and accused child killer Lindsay Clancy.
On the U.S. political front, classics include former First Lady Michelle Obama, aka Big Mike; Sen. Elizabeth Warren; and former Vice President Kamala Harris.
On the business side of Spirit Halloween memes are portrayals of a LinkedIn influencer and private equity associate.



Sunday, September 20, 2026

AI-written articles: The good and the bad


Artificial intelligence programs now write as many online articles as humans, according to digital marketing firm Graphite. That reality has both negative and positive consequences.
On the negative side, some AI-generated articles feature information designed to deceive for political or commercial gain. Also, AI-created articles often contain factual errors and hallucinations.
In addition, AI-generated articles have the potential to flood the internet with misinformation and crowd out fact-checked human-created articles.
Plus, bad actors are making it hard to tell what’s real and what’s fake news on the internet.
As with all new technologies, there are opportunities for benefits and harm.
On the plus side, AI-written articles could serve “news deserts” – areas without human reporters.
If they have access to digitized police and court records, AI systems could quickly generate reports on crimes and legal actions. They could do the same with local government actions and provide summaries of live public meetings if they’re streamed online.
Further, AI systems could monitor location-based social media for incidents of interest, especially photos and videos. It could provide summaries of what is going on locally.
So, there’s likely good and bad with AI-written articles.

Photo: Graphic from Deutsche Bank report.

Related articles:

AI Now Writes as Many Online Articles as Humans (Graphite; May 2026)

With no local news, those in news deserts turn to social media feeds, influencers and gossip (Medill Local News Initiative at Northwestern University; Feb. 10, 2026)

Saturday, September 19, 2026

AI summaries are destroying the news business


Generative artificial intelligence is pushing the news business to the breaking point. AI summaries from the likes of Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and others are diverting revenue from news publishers, leading to fewer click-throughs, less advertising revenue and fewer subscriptions.
Staffers at Microsoft and OpenAI knew that scraping news websites to train their AI models could damage or even destroy those publications, according to court documents in a high-profile copyright infringement lawsuit filed by the New York Times. (See articles below.)
An OpenAI executive referred to an “existential threat” to publishers and a Microsoft executive said AI content scraping had started a “doom loop” for the news business, according to reports this week.
From a consumer perspective, the AI summaries are enticing. They give users the answers they are looking for instead of weblinks to full articles to read. Also, many publications have pay walls that provide friction for the casual web surfer but that AI systems have managed to bypass.
AI model builders must coordinate with news publishers and compensate them for their work. Otherwise, they could end up killing the valuable sources of information that they rely on for their answer engines.

Related articles:

Tech Companies’ Staff Knew Their AI Tools Posed ‘Existential Threat’ to Publishers (The Wall Street Journal; Sept. 17, 2026)

Microsoft and OpenAI Workers Worry About ‘Largest Theft of Labor’ in History (The New York Times; Sept. 17, 2026)

OpenAI, Microsoft executives' quotes on AI training threaten copyright defense, news outlets argue (Reuters; Sept. 17, 2026)

Google rolls out pay-per-value AI licensing program to publishers (Digiday; Sept. 14, 2026)

Ziff Davis CEO: if OpenAI can find $750 billion for data centers, it can find money for publishers, too (Fortune; Sept. 14, 2026)

Photo: AI artwork produced with prompts on Google Gemini.